فهرست منبع

Remove no longer necessary harmony fix

ManlyMarco 4 سال پیش
والد
کامیت
c096209581
3فایلهای تغییر یافته به همراه0 افزوده شده و 39 حذف شده
  1. 0 1
      BepInEx.Preloader/BepInEx.Preloader.csproj
  2. 0 2
      BepInEx.Preloader/Preloader.cs
  3. 0 36
      BepInEx.Preloader/RuntimeFixes/HarmonyFixes.cs

+ 0 - 1
BepInEx.Preloader/BepInEx.Preloader.csproj

@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@
     <Compile Include="Patching\AssemblyPatcher.cs" />
     <Compile Include="Entrypoint.cs" />
     <Compile Include="Patching\PatcherPlugin.cs" />
-    <Compile Include="RuntimeFixes\HarmonyFixes.cs" />
     <Compile Include="RuntimeFixes\TraceFix.cs" />
     <Compile Include="Preloader.cs" />
     <Compile Include="Logger\PreloaderLogWriter.cs" />

+ 0 - 2
BepInEx.Preloader/Preloader.cs

@@ -43,8 +43,6 @@ namespace BepInEx.Preloader
 
 				Logger.Sources.Add(TraceLogSource.CreateSource());
 
-				HarmonyFixes.Apply();
-
 				PreloaderLog = new PreloaderConsoleListener(ConfigPreloaderCOutLogging.Value);
 				Logger.Listeners.Add(PreloaderLog);
 

+ 0 - 36
BepInEx.Preloader/RuntimeFixes/HarmonyFixes.cs

@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
-using System;
-using System.Diagnostics;
-using HarmonyLib;
-
-namespace BepInEx.Preloader.RuntimeFixes
-{
-	internal static class HarmonyFixes
-	{
-		public static void Apply()
-		{
-			try
-			{
-				var harmony = new HarmonyLib.Harmony("BepInEx.Preloader.RuntimeFixes.HarmonyFixes");
-				harmony.Patch(AccessTools.Method(typeof(Traverse), nameof(Traverse.GetValue), new Type[0]), null, new HarmonyMethod(typeof(HarmonyFixes), nameof(GetValue)));
-				harmony.Patch(AccessTools.Method(typeof(Traverse), nameof(Traverse.SetValue), new []{ typeof(object) }), null, new HarmonyMethod(typeof(HarmonyFixes), nameof(SetValue)));
-            }
-			catch (Exception e)
-			{
-				Logging.Logger.LogError(e);
-			}
-		}
-
-		private static void GetValue(Traverse __instance)
-		{
-			if (!__instance.FieldExists() && !__instance.MethodExists() && !__instance.TypeExists())
-				Logging.Logger.LogWarning("Traverse.GetValue was called while not pointing at an existing Field, Property, Method or Type. The return value can be unexpected.\n" + new StackTrace());
-		}
-
-		private static void SetValue(Traverse __instance)
-		{
-			// If method exists it will crash inside traverse so only need to mention the field missing
-			if (!__instance.FieldExists() && !__instance.MethodExists())
-				Logging.Logger.LogWarning("Traverse.SetValue was called while not pointing at an existing Field or Property. The call will have no effect.\n" + new StackTrace());
-		}
-	}
-}